What’s new

Release notes

Every change to the PIM evaluation module is documented here — a brief description of what changed and the date it was made. We version each release and use GitHub as the version-control system, so changes are tracked over time and easy to roll back if needed.

v1.0.0.beta
MajorSignificant updates to the platform
MinorMinor changes to UI / UX
PatchSmaller bug fixes
Operational pre-releasePre-release / testing version
Aug 17 2026v2.2.0.beta

Assessment workspace redesign

MinorPatch

Rebuilt the assessment workspace. One long scroll becomes a hub with two openable components — Assessment findings and Prioritisation scoring — each with progress meters and live status. Findings and scores now show the content as it will stand in the memo, and editing happens in the card itself. The nine model calls in a review run now fan out over HTTP and run in parallel instead of serially. Assessment also moves into the suite header, reachable from any page.

Aug 7 2026v2.1.0.beta

Multi-criteria analysis scoring

Minor

Added multi-criteria analysis to the assessment module. Projects are scored 1–5 against four weighted criteria — urgency and criticality (30), expected economic and development impact (30), environmental impact (20), and fiscal affordability and sustainability (20) — producing a weighted total, a normalised score, and a priority band. Each drafted score cites verified evidence or is explicitly marked as scored on absent evidence. Reviewers accept or adjust every score with a rationale, and the endorsed result carries into the assessment memo.

Jul 30 2026v2.0.0.beta

Assessment reviewer module

Major

Added the reviewer module — the central PIM agency view. A proposer submits their Project Concept Note for review and the module drafts an assessment across five core properties: completeness and conformity, internal coherence, evidence quality, cost realism, and risk and deliverability. Each finding carries a verdict, its reasoning, and verified quotes from the submission. The reviewer accepts, edits, or dismisses every finding, writes a summary, and exports a branded assessment memo. Export stays blocked until every finding is decided.

Jul 20 2026v1.4.0.beta

North Macedonia PCN template

Minor

Added the first country-specific template: the North Macedonia Project Concept Note, authored from official country PCN material across seven sections. It sits alongside the global template when starting a new project and is evaluated against its own dedicated set of quality and conformity criteria — demonstrating how the module adapts to a country's requirements without changes to the application itself.

Jul 16 2026v1.3.0.beta

New template building blocks & interface refinements

MinorPatch

Introduced three new structured input building blocks for templates: an option appraisal for comparing project alternatives, a financial matrix for structured cost and financing tables, and periodic amounts for per-period figures with automatic totals. Each is a reusable, template-driven control with its own validation and PDF-export rendering, available to any current or future template. The editor was also refined — the last-saved indicator now sits in the utility bar next to Export, improving UX.

Jul 13 2026v1.2.0.beta

Downloadable PDF exports

Minor

Added downloadable, branded PDF exports as a core application output, giving users a polished, shareable record of their current Project Concept Note. Each export is generated in a dedicated web worker, keeping document rendering responsive and separate from the form.

Jul 7 2026v1.1.0.beta

Default supported projects

Minor

Added default supported projects as a guided example for new Concept Notes. They help users see the template structure, understand the expected level of detail, and work through a practical example before starting their own submission.

Jun 8 2026v1.0.0.beta

Initial Beta Release

Operational pre-release

The PIM PCN evaluation module is now available as an operational pre-release. Proposers can complete a structured Project Concept Note using the global template across all six sections and receive AI-assisted, per-field feedback against quality and conformity criteria — helping strengthen submissions before they reach a human reviewer.